Friday, October 3, 2008

How many of you follow GANDHI's rules and regulations



Hi friends on Oct 2nd we celebrate GANDHI JAYANTHI,but how many of you regularly follow rules and regulations of GANDHI.Now i am going to tell some thing about GANDHI.

Born:Oct 2nd 1869(Porbandar, Kathiawar agency,British India)

Died:Jan 30th 1948 (aged 78) New Delhi, Union of India

Cause Of Death: ASSASSINATION

Nationality:INDIAN

Other Names: MAHATMA, GANDHI

Education:UNIVERSITY COLLEGE,LONDON

Known For: INDIAN INDEPENDENCE MOVEMENT

Political Party:INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS


Religious Beliefs:HINDUISM

Spouse(s):KASTURBA GANDHI

Children:HARILAL, MANILAL, RAMDAS, DEVDAS

MOHANDAS KARAMCHAND GANDHI SIGNATURE:

Please read this and write your comments if u wish:

Monday, September 29, 2008

UNESCO selected INDIA's National Anthem is best one



Indian National Anthem "JANA GANA MANA" written and composed by RABINDRA NATH TAGORE has been chosen as the World's Best National Anthem by UNESCO.

JANA GANA MANA written in Sanskritised Bengali, it is the first of the five stanzas of aBrahmo hymn composed and scored by Nobel Laureate Rabindra Nath Tagore.

It was first sung at the Calcutta Session of the Indian National Congress, on 27 December 1911. JANA GANA MANA was officially adopted by the constituent Assembly as the Indian National Anthem on January 24, 1950. The music for the "current version" is said to be derived from a composition for the song by RAM SINGH THAKUR, although some dispute this, A formal rendition of the National Anthem takes about forty-eight to fifty-two seconds.

Sunday, September 21, 2008

Flies given human genes

Genes from humans and jellyfish are being injected into flies to help find new treatments for diseases like Alzheimer's and dementia.

It is hoped the newly-developed technique will speed up the search for effective drugs to tackle conditions of the nervous system. Human genes related to the diseases are transferred into fruit flies, which are given various substances to find out if they have any effect. The jellyfish DNA is used to make part of the brain flash different colours: a blue light changes to green if the drug has an effect.

This helps scientists narrow down drug treatments through generations of flies, which inherit the genes. Researchers at Brainwave Discovery Ltd said it was an alternative to experiments on mice. Dr Douglas Armstrong, the company's chief scientific officer, said: "Using fruit flies saves time and money. They hatch in days and live up to 100 days so results take just weeks."

Mobile phone use 'raises children's risk of brain cancer fivefold'

Children and teenagers are five times more likely to get brain cancer if they use mobile phones, startling new research indicates.

The study, experts say, raises fears that today's young people may suffer an "epidemic" of the disease in later life. At least nine out of 10 British 16-year-olds have their own handset, as do more than 40 per cent of primary schoolchildren.

Yet investigating dangers to the young has been omitted from a massive £3.1m British investigation of the risks of cancer from using mobile phones, launched this year, even though the official Mobile Telecommunications and Health Research (MTHR) Programme – which is conducting it – admits that the issue is of the "highest priority".

Despite recommendations of an official report that the use of mobiles by children should be "minimised", the Government has done almost nothing to discourage it.

Last week the European Parliament voted by 522 to 16 to urge ministers across Europe to bring in stricter limits for exposure to radiation from mobile and cordless phones, Wi-fi and other devices, partly because children are especially vulnerable to them. They are more at risk because their brains and nervous systems are still developing and because – since their heads are smaller and their skulls are thinner – the radiation penetrates deeper into their brains.

The Swedish research was reported this month at the first international conference on mobile phones and health.

It sprung from a further analysis of data from one of the biggest studies carried out into the risk that the radiation causes cancer, headed by Professor Lennart Hardell of the University Hospital in Orebro, Sweden. Professor Hardell told the conference – held at the Royal Society by the Radiation Research Trust – that "people who started mobile phone use before the age of 20" had more than five-fold increase in glioma", a cancer of the glial cells that support the central nervous system. The extra risk to young people of contracting the disease from using the cordless phone found in many homes was almost as great, at more than four times higher.

Those who started using mobiles young, he added, were also five times more likely to get acoustic neuromas, benign but often disabling tumours of the auditory nerve, which usually cause deafness.

By contrast, people who were in their twenties before using handsets were only 50 per cent more likely to contract gliomas and just twice as likely to get acoustic neuromas.

Professor Hardell told the IoS: "This is a warning sign. It is very worrying. We should be taking precautions." He believes that children under 12 should not use mobiles except in emergencies and that teenagers should use hands-free devices or headsets and concentrate on texting. At 20 the danger diminishes because then the brain is fully developed. Indeed, he admits, the hazard to children and teenagers may be greater even than his results suggest, because the results of his study do not show the effects of their using the phones for many years. Most cancers take decades to develop, longer than mobile phones have been on the market.

The research has shown that adults who have used the handsets for more than 10 years are much more likely to get gliomas and acoustic neuromas, but he said that there was not enough data to show how such relatively long-term use would increase the risk for those who had started young.

He wants more research to be done, but the risks to children will not be studied in the MTHR study, which will follow 90,000 people in Britain. Professor David Coggon, the chairman of the programmes management committee, said they had not been included because other research was being done on young people by a study at Sweden's Kariolinska Institute.

He said: "It looks frightening to see a five-fold increase in cancer among people who started use in childhood," but he said he "would be extremely surprised" if the risk was shown to be so high once all the evidence was in.

But David Carpenter, dean of the School of Public Health at the State University of NewYork – who also attended the conference – said: "Children are spending significant time on mobile phones. We may be facing a public health crisis in an epidemic of brain cancers as a result of mobile phone use."

In 2000 and 2005, two official inquiries under Sir William Stewart, a former government chief scientist, recommended the use of mobile phones by children should be "discouraged" and "minimised".

But almost nothing has been done, and their use by the young has more than doubled since the turn of the millennium.

Nervous people 'are likely to be right-wing'

People who are easily startled by loud bangs or gruesome pictures are more likely to vote for right-wing policies compared to calmer people who take a more liberal approach to life, according to a psychological study of political beliefs.

The findings support the idea that personality type influences political attitude, which could explain why voting differences appear to be entrenched. "Although political views have been thought to arise largely from individuals' experiences, recent research suggests a possible biological basis. We present evidence that variations in political attitudes correlate with psychological traits," said John Hibbing of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.

The study, published in the journal Science, investigated 46 Americans with strong opinions spanning the political spectrum who were tested for their physiological responses to a range of visually threatening pictures and loud noises.

"Subjects with measurably lower physical sensitivities to sudden noises and threatening images were more likely to support foreign aid, liberal immigration policies, pacifism and gun control," Dr Hibbing said.

"Whereas individuals displaying measurably higher physiological reactions to those same stimuli were more likely to favour defence spending, capital punishment, patriotism and the Iraq war," he said. Physiological responses that were monitored included the electrical conductivity of the skin – measuring sweat production – and the amount of eye-blinking after a loud noise. Such responses are not under conscious control and are considered good indicators of a person's overall nervous disposition.

They were shown three threatening images – a large spider on a frightened face, a dazed individual covered in blood and an open wound filled with maggots – interspersed with neutral images and three non-threatening images, such as a bowl of fruit and a happy child.

The scientists believe the findings support the belief that political attitudes reflect the way a person deals with potential threats. "Consequently, our research provides one possible explanation for both the lack of malleability in the beliefs of individuals with strong political convictions and for the associated ubiquity of political conflict," they said.

with regards:
mworld